Jackson's test of exponentiality
Jackson.test.Rd
Jackson's test of exponentiality
Usage
Jackson.test(x, method = c("num", "sim", "asymp"), nSamp = 15000)
Arguments
- x
numeric vector or matrix.
- method
Character: choice of the method used to compute the \(p\)-value. See the Details section.
- nSamp
Number of samples used to compute the \(p\)-value if
method
is"sim"
.
Value
A list of results.
- statistic, p.value
-
The statistic and \(p\)-value.
- df
-
Number \(n\) of observations.
- method
-
Description of the test implemented, regardless of how the \(p\)-value has been computed.
Details
Compute the Jackson's test of exponentiality. The test statistic is the ratio of weighted sums of the order statistics. Both sums can also be written as weighted sums of the scalings.
The Jackson's statistic for a sample of size \(n\) of the
exponential distribution can be shown to be approximately
normal. More precisely \(\sqrt{n}(J_n -2)\) has approximately a standard normal distribution.
This distribution is used to compute the \(p\)-value when
method
is "asymp"
. When method
is
"num"
, a numerical approximation of the distribution
is used. Finally, when method
is "sim"
the
\(p\)-value is computed by simulating nSamp
samples of size length(x)
and estimating the
probability to have a Jackson's statistic larger than that
of the 'observed' x
.
Note
Jackson's test of exponentiality works fine for a Lomax alternative (GPD with heavy tail). It then reaches nearly the same power as a Likelihood Ratio (LR) test, see Kozubowski et al. It can be implemented more easily than the LR test because simulated values of the test statistic can be obtained quickly enough to compute the \(p\)-value by simulation.
See also
The Jackson
function computing the statistic and the
LRExp.test
function.
References
J. Beirlant and T. de Weit and Y. Goegebeur(2006) "A Goodness-of-fit Statistic for Pareto-Type Behaviour", J. Comp. Appl. Math., 186(1), pp. 99-116.
T.J. Kozubowski, A. K. Panorska, F. Qeadan, A. Gershunov and D. Rominger (2009) "Testing Exponentiality Versus Pareto Distribution via Likelihood Ratio" Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 38(1), pp. 118-139.